The hard right has been waging a War on Women, and their personal freedoms. It appears they are also waging a War on Children, and their intellectual freedoms.
No kid of mine is gonna be smarter than me.
A teacher I know related how one time in a parent-teacher meeting, a father said this about his son. I think that most of us find his comment shocking. Good parents work hard in the hope that our children will definitely be smarter than we are.
But Smarter Means Different
But I wonder how many of us think that all the way through. If our children are smarter than we are, that doesn’t mean they’ll just solve algebra equations faster. It means they will ask questions that never occurred to us. They may even question our politics, our religion, and our lifestyle choices.
Everyone is for freedom of expression, right up until someone disagrees with him. Similarly, managers want employees who can think critically about the business, as long as they don’t think critically about the manager, his policies or his decisions.
Critical Thinking & Schools
I see the same thing in our schools. Every school administration says they want to teach kids to think critically, but then they make it clear that they don’t want the students to question or challenge anything; not the school books, not the curriculum, not administration.
Not even the dress code.
So by default what we see are managers and school boards say: “Think critically about everything, except what we tell you.”
Which sounds to me like, “Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain.”
Open Mindedness
One of my basic motivations for this blog is to urge people to cultivate an open mind. That requires that we be skeptical of what we believe, and that we be tolerant of others who question what we believe. We should not be overly confident about what we know.
Or more precisely, what we think we know.
Because what we think we know changes. I noted that ideas constantly change in both politics and religion; but also that our scientific ideas constantly change.
Changing Ideology
I also noted that the American Founders would be wildly disoriented by modern technology. If they would find modern technology dizzying, just imagine what they would think of modern religion, government and lifestyles.
Some people point to just those Founders and their views, to argue that we have gone too far. But how far is ‘too’ far? Because I don’t think there are many today would give up what we have, and go back to live in 1776. First, we would not give up our luxuries; and like it or not, our ability to innovate and create new solutions seems to be connected to a relaxation of the rigidity of 18th century society. Second, not even the severest critic of modern government would sacrifice our roads, the protections of a standing military, strict government overview of drugs, the advances that NASA has provided us, nor other governmental ‘oddities’ as the Internet.
Certainly you wouldn’t: without the Internet, you wouldn’t be reading this scintillating blog.
Either way, the Founders never envisioned government taking on any of these new tasks. So if our kids are smarter than we are, they are going to go in directions that we might not approve of. Americans have certainly gone many places that would shock the Founders.
War on Women
Which brings us to the ‘conservative’ War on Women. Before continuing, I would like to say I reject that accusation. I have known too many conservatives who feel quite strongly that women should have the same freedoms, privileges, and wages that men do. There are also conservatives who are pro-choice, and many more who, while strongly opposing abortion, nevertheless grudgingly agree with the opinions of Roe v. Wade, that the practicalities of policing women’s reproductive systems violate too much of our Constitution.
So it is my observation that the war on women does not come from conservatives, but from the hard right. Think about it: ‘hard’ means inflexible.
Hard means closed-minded.
So it’s not conservatives waging a War on Women, but extremists; it’s the closed-minded right.
War on Children
Which brings us back to our point. Because I suspect for some years they have been expanding their scope into a War on Children. The hard right wants to deny children their freedoms as well.
First, we have seen attacks on curricula and text books in grade schools around the country, with an insistence on teaching creationism and omitting Darwinism, pushes for other religious intrusions, and an adamant narrative of American Exceptionalism. Clearly, there are officials who want students to inherit freedom, but not the freedom to disagree with the those officials.
Attacks on Higher Education
We see a parallel in higher education across the country where hard-right administrations – again, not conservatives, but inflexible ideologues – have carried the War on Children into higher education. We have seen it here in Louisiana, where higher education has been slashed repeatedly, ironically by a governor who previously headed one of the systems he later proved intent on destroying.
But Louisiana isn’t unusual. State elected administrations – exclusively, hard-right administrations – have been waging a war on children. They have cut or attempted to cut funding to higher education across the nation: Texas, Minnesota North Carolina, Mississippi, Wisconsin, Indiana, and several others. It seems to be a coordinated effort.
And it is. In Louisiana, a friend of mine, someone active at the highest levels of state government, filled me in. On more than one occasion the Governor said to a close circle of conservative elected officials that he wanted to limit higher education to students from the more affluent classes. He assumed that his circle shared his priorities; he never considered that many conservatives believe in strong universal education, and might leak his comments. One of them did, and also leaked the Governor’s reasoning for slashing higher ed: kids from wealthier families are more likely to vote with the Governor’s party. This attitude, and strategy, has emerged from the hard right over the past couple of decades.
In contrast, the kids who struggle, who don’t have the same advantages, are statistically much more likely to vote for the other party.
George F. Will
It can’t be a coincidence. I think it all goes back to the George F. Will essay I discussed, accusing colleges of being too liberal. There appears to be a narrative among the extreme right that if higher education is weakened, there will be fewer liberals in the country. So they are comfortable weakening our nation, and giving our children a diminished future, if it insures ideological conformity.
Which sounds a bit like, “No kid of mine is gonna be smarter than me.”
Or maybe, “Everyone supports freedom of expression, right up until someone disagrees with him.”
Ideas in this post are incorporated into my book, Kings, Conquerors, Psychopaths: From Alexander to Hitler to the Corporation, available from Amazon.
‘Feet in Chains’ courtesy of George Hodan on PublicDomainPictures.
Robin T.
Joe,
I’ve been away for a while and I come back to this? Has your body been recently snatched by a pod? It’s really hard decide where to start in responding to this, um, trying to find a polite word, oh, OK – “horse hockey”. (Thank you Col. Potter!)
If you are going to declare a “war on women” by the right, even the “hard right”, you had better come up with something better than life vs choice. I’ll debate you all day long on that. In the main it is a conflict between morality and self-indulgence. (Shields up.) And how do you define “hard right” anyway?
And as for higher education, it is the left wing loonies who have destroyed our universities – suppressing speech and thought whenever they can while increasing fees astronomically. How dare conservatives ask ivory tower academicians to live within a budget like the rest of us poor slobs!
C’mon, Joe. Less Kool-Aid please.
Bookscrounger
Robin,
Make you a deal: less rhetoric and invective, and we can talk collegially.
How about it?
Robin T.
Deal. Who are these hard right people and what exactly is their war on women?
Bookscrounger
The ‘War on Women’ is a minority who oppose legislation guaranteeing equal pay for women and other protections, in addition to reproductive services.
As for ‘hard right’ it’s pretty much the same as the ‘hard left.’ Humorless people who are driven by ideology, and who completely miss the humanity.
Same for the left wing in the universities. There is intolerance at both extremes. What is concerning me is that by cutting funding, the wounds are deep, and lasting; and the other party isn’t the victim, but our kids, their futures, and the future of the democracy. It takes decades to build up a strong department; one administration can wipe it out.
And the irony is that it’s the highest-priced faculty who move on to other states. Those are engineering and business, and they aren’t typically liberal. Meanwhile, the lower-paid arts and liberal arts, where the strong liberals are often found, stay on. So the culture that is most harmed is the conservative culture.
In Louisiana, UL and LSU are the only schools that will survive this reasonably intact. The other schools in the state have been decimated, or worse.
That’s why this is so upsetting to me; I always thought that education was a bipartisan issue.
And for the centrists, it is.
Robin T.
Joe,
Everyone wants good education, although they may disagree on how to achieve it. I can’t really speak to what’s happening in Louisiana today since I’m pretty far removed from it. In general, though, America spends more per student on elementary and secondary education than almost every other country in the world. For those expenditures we get an 80% graduation rate, and it’s arguable whether those graduate really have a secondary education.
Your focus seems to be on college education. I think this issue comes in a distant second to the crisis in secondary education in this country.
My bigger issue with your post is the “war on women”. Separate response.
Bookscrounger
This is a post about the War on Children.
If you will read through my posts, I focus on overall education. But college is the lens that creates our world: it educates the teachers and leaders, they lead and educate everyone else. Reduce the great universities back to their beginnings as fundamentalist Bible schools (and there are those who would be quite happy with that) and the modern world never emerges. Progress was and is a struggle because of the fundamentalist (and see my post on Scientific Fundamentalism) opposition.
Robin T.
Regarding the “war on women”, this is a fiction created by the Democrat Party to ‘factionalize’ the electorate. It simply does not exist. Responsible people, and anyone who deems themselves to be centrist, should eschew the use of the term.
With respect to reproductive rights, if there were really a ‘war on women’ you would have to indict vast numbers of women as the perpetrators. Go to a prayer vigil at a Planned Parenthood clinic. In my experience the women have outnumbered the men 2 to 1. Among them, women who suffered great harm, physically and/or emotionally, from the abortion experience.
The pro-life movement is decidedly pro-woman and is led, in large part, by women. Please let’s not equate standing up to the abortion-as-big-business crowd to being anti-woman. Let’s stop using the false and incendiary “war on women” political slogan.
Durl
“… the practicalities of policing women’s reproductive systems …”. The real issue is not the policing of women’s reproductive systems. It’s finding the balance between the rights of the mother and the rights of the human being she is carrying. At some point, the unborn child should have rights.
In a course I took years ago, the instructor asked the class 2 questions:
1. Who is in favor of murder? No one raised a hand.
2. Who is in favor of forcing people to do things to their body that they do not wish to? No one raised a hand.
He then said: Folks, what you have before you is the crux of the abortion debate. Each side is entrenched in one of the 2 camps, and sees only the issue they think is most important. Goes right back to your discussion of being blind to what we don’t see or want to see.